Before reading the guidelines outlined on this page, ensure you have reviewed all the information about Progress Reviews, including the criteria for each review, and the Higher Degree by Research Candidature Progression Procedure.

How to organise a Progress Review

The following guidelines outline the management and conduct of HDR Progress Reviews at the Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN). These guidelines should be used in combination with the Higher Degree by Research Candidature Policy and the Higher Degree by Research Candidature Procedure. Further instructions to help you to arrange your upcoming review are available here.

Progress Reviews Snapshot

Progress review requirements

 

Confirmation of Candidature (R1)

Review 2 (R2)

Review 3 (R3)

Candidature Documents (required for each review)

Project Documents 

  • A draft/accepted manuscript or a draft results chapter
  • Thesis outline and plan
  • iThenticate report
  • Draft of thesis chapters
  • Plan for future work
  • iThenticate report

Review Meeting (closed) 

Approximately 60 minutes

Approximately 30 minutes

Approximately 30 minutes

Oral Presentation 

(open) 

30 minutes presentation including questions

One of the following:

  • conference presentation
  • AIBN seminar series presentation
  • 30 minutes presentation (including questions) to research group or progress review panel

One of the following:

  • conference presentation
  • AIBN seminar series presentation
  • 30 minutes presentation (including questions) to research group or progress review panel

Note: Documents should be submitted before the census date of the research quarter in which your review is due.

Panel Composition

At the AIBN your Progress Review Panel (PRP) will consist of at least two reviewers, one of whom will act as the chair.