Before reading the guidelines outlined on this page, ensure you have reviewed all the information about Progress Reviews, including the criteria for each review, and the Higher Degree by Research Candidature Progression Procedure.

How to organise a Progress Review

The following guidelines outline the management and conduct of HDR Progress Reviews in the School of Veterinary Science. These guidelines should be used in combination with the Higher Degree by Research Candidature Policy and the Higher Degree by Research Candidature Procedure. Further instructions to help you to arrange your upcoming review are available here.

Progress Reviews Snapshot

Progress review requirements

 

Confirmation of Candidature (R1)

Review 2 (R2)

Review 3 (R3)

Candidature Documents

Project Documents

  • Structured written work (35 – 45 pages)
  • Ethics application
  • Thesis draft
  • iThenticate report
  • Structured written work (10 pages)
  • Thesis draft
  • iThenticate report
  • Structured written work (10 pages)
  • Thesis draft
  • iThenticate report

Review Meeting

60 minutes

60 minutes

60 minutes

Oral Presentation

Open

20 minutes + 10 minutes

Open

20 minutes + 10 minutes

Open
45 minutes + 15 minutes

Note: Documents should be submitted by the census date in of research quarter in which your review is due.

Panel Composition

Your Progress Review Panel (PRP) in the School of Veterinary Science will consist of a chair and two reviewers.